
Many of those who support reforms to the human rights system are particularly troubled by Section 13 of the federal act, and similar provisions in provincial human rights codes. This section prohibits the publication of discriminatory speech, which is rightly viewed as a severe and unwarranted infringement on our freedom of expression and the freedom of the press. If there was a referendum on Section 13, there is little doubt that Canadians would want it scrapped.
But many of those who oppose Section 13 are lukewarm or supportive of the rest of the human rights legislation, along with the bureaucracy and quasi-judicial tribunals that they create. It is a tougher challenge to convince Canadians of the necessity to reform, replace, or remove these institutions in their entirety. The Commissions and Tribunals have for years engaged in successful public relations campaigns to trumpet their success and stoke fears of what might happen should their comfortable jobs be eliminated.
The Alberta Court of Appeal recently struck down an Alberta Human Rights Panel decision that extended employer-employee human rights obligations to contractor arrangements. In its original decision, the AHRP was asked to rule whether Syncrude could be named as an employer in a complaint, even though the complainant worked for a subcontractor. The complaint centered on whether the project’s drug-testing requirements infringed upon the rights of an employee who was fired after failing a test.
Howard Levitt, Financial Post (Dec 8, 2010): Is Canada becoming a nanny state? A recent decision by the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal dramatically expanded employers' obligations to staff with children, and the impact could be far-reaching. Fiona Johnstone and her husband were border services officers at Pearson International Airport in Toronto. Her job processing goods and travellers entering Canada was part of a 24-hour operation, with irregular rotating shifts and six different start times. Read more...
Toronto Sun: By Brian Lilley, Nov 12 2010 - OTTAWA - A new lobby group says it wants to warn Canadians that their fundamental freedoms – such as freedom of expression, belief, thought and religion - are being threatened by the groups sworn to uphold them.
The campaign, from a group called Stand Up For Freedom Canada, claims human rights commissions and tribunals at the federal and provincial level are a threat to Charter-protected rights for all Canadians.
By Patrick B. Craine, VANCOUVER, B.C., November 11, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - As Canada remembers today those fallen soldiers who offered their lives to preserve the country’s freedom, a new grassroots campaign is launching to protect those hard-won freedoms from a new and unlikely threat – our own government’s human rights commissions and tribunals.
October 27, 2010: PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY - The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has dismissed a complaint against the County Weekly News for an editorial that appeared in the paper in 2009. Alan Whiteley, a lawyer who lives in Picton, filed the complaint, arguing the contents of the editorial discriminated against an identifiable group — newly arrived "imports" to Prince Edward County. Adjudicator David A. Wright decided the tribunal "has no jurisdiction to scrutinize the content of newspaper editorials." Read more