Latest News

Previous Next
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
Barbarian-phobic Barbarian-phobic We couldn't resist posting this one! Check out the editorial cartoon by Brian Gable, from the Globe and Mail: Read more
Supreme Court Ruling on Free Speech tomorrow! Supreme Court Ruling on Free Speech tomorrow! The Supreme Court of Canada will release the long-awaited decision on the Bill Whatcott case. We reported on that case when it was heard 16 months ago (click here to read up on the case). We will post the results as soon as we know what they are. In the meantime, you are on notice that whatever the decision is, we must work to eliminate t... Read more
But some animals are more equal than others But some animals are more equal than others From the National Post: The Ontario Human Rights Tribunal has dismissed a complaint against a women’s studies professor who fought a Catholic volunteerism program at Brock University, saying [the professor's] anti-Catholic comments were offensive, but not akin to discrimination. Although the complainant was treated differently due to his... Read more
Alberta court of appeal dismisses appeal against Boisson Alberta court of appeal dismisses appeal against Boisson The Calgary Sun reports that, after a legal fight lasting nearly 11 years over a letter to the editor, Prof. Darren Lund is disappointed Alberta’s Court of Appeal dismissed his case, allowing “free reign to hate mongers”. Rev. Stephen Boisson is the minister who, after writing and publishing this letter in his local paper was fined and o... Read more
Why Do We Still Have Hate Speech Laws? While not specifically dealing with the Human Rights Commissions, Tribunals and Codes, Andrew Coyne tackles the idea of hate speech laws and why they don't work in a functioning democracy. He makes a number of good points which our provinces should take to heart in evaluating their own human rights codes. Andrew Coyne National Post July ... Read more
Head of Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on Stress Leave Head of Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on Stress Leave The working atmosphere of the CHRT begs the question - if it needs to be investigated for harassment among other things, how can it be in charge of determining "human rights" offenses for the nation? Selection from the Vancouver Sun, April 23 2012: The Ottawa Citizen has also learned that the Office of the Public Sector Integrity Commis... Read more
Did tribunal exceed its authority? Supreme Court of Canada will decide Thursday if human rights decision should be upheld Vancouver Sun, March 21 2012: On Thursday, the Supreme Court of Canada will hear the appeal of Moore v. British Columbia Ministry of Education. Among other things, this case will decide whether the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal has the authority to dictate what services the B.C. government provides. Jeffrey Moore started grade school in... Read more
A right to special treatment Pamela Howson clearly knows how the human rights system works. First, claim membership of a “protected” group. In Ontario, their Human Rights Code includes protection on the basis of “family status”, which has been interpreted by the provincial tribunal as granting privileged status to mothers with children. Ms. Howson has three children... Read more
Press Release Press Release For Immediate Release – November 23, 2011 (Ottawa, ON): Stand Up For Freedom Canada calls on all members of Parliament to support Bill C-304, “An Act to Amend the Human Rights Act”. Last night, Bill C-304 was read and debated in the House of Commons. The bill, introduced by MP Brian Storseth, seeks to ensure greater protection of free... Read more
Support Bill C-304! Use our Easy Mail Technology Today It only takes a few minutes to use this site's Easy Mail technology to send a letter to your MP, along with the Justice Minister, in support of a much-needed law to reform the Canadian Human Rights Act. It is free, customizable, and you won't get any unwanted newsletter or donation requests. We provide this for the sake of FREEDOM. Click ... Read more
Policing Hurt Feelings The various Canadian human rights codes were not necessarily designed to protect hurt feelings of designated groups. The intention was to prevent a situation in which an person  was denied basic goods and services on the basis of some prejudice or another. Yet we hear again and again from editorials critical of the rights racket that... Read more
Non-Muslims Need Not Apply The National Post recently ran a story about housing advertisements in Ontario that are clearly running afoul of the Ontario Human Rights Commission’s policy. Specifically, the reporter was able to find several ads in which it was stated, “non-Muslims need not apply” or some variation thereof. When the reporter called the OHRC to ask abo... Read more

Poll

Canada's human rights commissions should be
 

Paste Into Your Blog

Home In a Nutshell
In a Nutshell PDF Print E-mail

Canadians are blessed with incredible freedoms and privileges. But that does not mean that these are guaranteed or will continue without challenges. In recent years, quasi-judicial commissions and tribunals have been exploiting the authority they were entrusted with by creating new “rights” and undermining the fundamental freedoms that we easily take for granted, including freedom of speech and expression, freedom of religion and conscience, freedom of the press, and freedom of assembly and association.

The Abuses on Freedom by the HRC’s

Human rights commissions and tribunals have become the favorite tool of activists to make life difficult for any person or organization that they despise.  Consider these facts:

  1. The complainant receives free legal assistance from the Commission and is often reimbursed for any expenses incurred.
  2. The respondent receives no financial assistance, and in almost all cases must fund their own defence.
  3. Some remedial orders have involved forced statements, confessions, recantations, and “diversity training” which contravene the fundamental right to freedom of conscience.
  4. The hurt feelings of the complainant alone are sufficient to warrant a remedy by the Tribunal, even with no proof of harm.
  5. The Commissions have subtly created new prohibited grounds for discrimination without democratic consent.
  6. The Commissions have more investigative powers than the police.
  7. The Tribunal's quasi-judicial rules short-circuit many of the vital checks and balances that exist in our court systems.

Momentum is Building

For many years the victims of the commissions and tribunals were ordinary Canadians who did not have the funds or networks to respond to the complaints against them. But more recently, the commissions made the mistake of taking on two high-profile magazines – Macleans and the Western Standard. Thanks to their willingness to stand up for freedom, Canadians are now much more aware of what is going on.

  1. In 2009 Parliament’s Justice Committee started an inquiry into the activities of the Canadian HRC.
  2. A private member’s bill has been introduced to reform the federal human rights code.
  3. Dozens of newspapers have written editorials calling for the reform or removal of the HRC’s.
  4. MP’s and MLA’s/MPP’s from across the political spectrum are calling for reform.

Time for Action!

We need the public to add their voice so that this momentum will result in legislative changes. Until the public makes its concerns heard, our governments will refuse to take the necessary steps to reform or remove these commissions and tribunals.  You need to stand up for freedom today! Visit www.HumanRightsCommissions.ca for contact information for your provincial and federal representatives, sample letters, talking points, and many more resources to make it easy for you to share your concerns with the appropriate government leaders.

---

"Human rights commissions, as they are evolving, are an attack o­n our fundamental freedoms and the basic existence of a democratic society…It is in fact totalitarianism. I find this is very scary stuff."

     Stephen Harper, B.C. Report Newsmagazine, January 11, 1999

“During the years when my colleagues and I were labouring to create such commissions we never imagined that they might ultimately be used against freedom of speech.”

     Alan Borovoy, General Counsel of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, and foundational father of the first Human Rights Commission in Canada

Introduction

Canadians are blessed with incredible freedoms and privileges. But that does not mean that these are guaranteed or will continue without challenges. In recent years, quasi-judicial commissions and tribunals have been exploiting the authority they were entrusted with by creating new “rights” and undermining the fundamental freedoms that we easily take for granted, including freedom of speech and expression, freedom of religion and conscience, freedom of the press, and freedom of assembly and association.

The Abuses on Freedom by the HRC’s

Human rights commissions and tribunals have become the favorite tool of activists to make life difficult for any person or organization that they despise.  Consider these facts:

The complainant receives free legal assistance from the Commission and is often reimbursed for any expenses incurred.

The respondent receives no financial assistance, and in almost all cases must fund their own defence.

 
Copyright by Human Rights Commissions 2010 to Present